18 research outputs found

    A Tale of Four ā€œCarpā€: Invasion Potential and Ecological Niche Modeling

    Get PDF
    . We assessed the geographic potential of four Eurasian cyprinid fishes (common carp, tench, grass carp, black carp) as invaders in North America via ecological niche modeling (ENM). These ā€œcarpā€ represent four stages of invasion of the continent (a long-established invader with a wide distribution, a long-established invader with a limited distribution, a spreading invader whose distribution is expanding, and a newly introduced potential invader that is not yet established), and as such illustrate the progressive reduction of distributional disequilibrium over the history of species' invasions.We used ENM to estimate the potential distributional area for each species in North America using models based on native range distribution data. Environmental data layers for native and introduced ranges were imported from state, national, and international climate and environmental databases. Models were evaluated using independent validation data on native and invaded areas. We calculated omission error for the independent validation data for each species: all native range tests were highly successful (all omission values <7%); invaded-range predictions were predictive for common and grass carp (omission values 8.8 and 19.8%, respectively). Model omission was high for introduced tench populations (54.7%), but the model correctly identified some areas where the species has been successful; distributional predictions for black carp show that large portions of eastern North America are at risk.ENMs predicted potential ranges of carp species accurately even in regions where the species have not been present until recently. ENM can forecast species' potential geographic ranges with reasonable precision and within the short screening time required by proposed U.S. invasive species legislation

    Developing an Effective Model for Predicting Spatially and Temporally Continuous Stream Temperatures from Remotely Sensed Land Surface Temperatures

    No full text
    Although water temperature is important to stream biota, it is difficult to collect in a spatially and temporally continuous fashion. We used remotely-sensed Land Surface Temperature (LST) data to estimate mean daily stream temperature for every confluence-to-confluence reach in the John Day River, OR, USA for a ten year period. Models were built at three spatial scales: site-specific, subwatershed, and basin-wide. Model quality was assessed using jackknife and cross-validation. Model metrics for linear regressions of the predicted vs. observed data across all sites and years: site-specific r2 = 0.95, Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) = 1.25 Ā°C; subwatershed r2 = 0.88, RMSE = 2.02 Ā°C; and basin-wide r2 = 0.87, RMSE = 2.12 Ā°C. Similar analyses were conducted using 2012 eight-day composite LST and eight-day mean stream temperature in five watersheds in the interior Columbia River basin. Mean model metrics across all basins: r2 = 0.91, RMSE = 1.29 Ā°C. Sensitivity analyses indicated accurate basin-wide models can be parameterized using data from as few as four temperature logger sites. This approach generates robust estimates of stream temperature through time for broad spatial regions for which there is only spatially and temporally patchy observational data, and may be useful for managers and researchers interested in stream biota

    Model selection metrics for hurdle count regression models fit to occurrence and abundance data for steelhead redds at 209 sites in the John Day River basin, Oregon.

    No full text
    1<p>Model results are ranked by AIC<sub>c</sub> from best to worst, and Akaike weights (<i>w<sub>i</sub></i>,)>0.05 are also shown.</p>2<p><i>K</i> is the number of estimated parameters, L-L is the log-likelihood, and Ī”AIC<sub>c</sub> is the difference in AIC<sub>c</sub> relative to the best model (see <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0079232#pone.0079232-terBraak1" target="_blank">[41]</a> for details).</p

    Spatial Ecological Processes and Local Factors Predict the Distribution and Abundance of Spawning by Steelhead (<i>Oncorhynchus mykiss</i>) across a Complex Riverscape

    Get PDF
    <div><p>Processes that influence habitat selection in landscapes involve the interaction of habitat composition and configuration and are particularly important for species with complex life cycles. We assessed the relative influence of landscape spatial processes and local habitat characteristics on patterns in the distribution and abundance of spawning steelhead (<i>Oncorhynchus mykiss</i>), a threatened salmonid fish, across āˆ¼15,000 stream km in the John Day River basin, Oregon, USA. We used hurdle regression and a multi-model information theoretic approach to identify the relative importance of covariates representing key aspects of the steelhead life cycle (e.g., site access, spawning habitat quality, juvenile survival) at two spatial scales: within 2-km long survey reaches (local sites) and ecological neighborhoods (5 km) surrounding the local sites. Based on Akaikeā€™s Information Criterion, models that included covariates describing ecological neighborhoods provided the best description of the distribution and abundance of steelhead spawning given the data. Among these covariates, our representation of offspring survival (growing-season-degree-days, Ā°C) had the strongest effect size (7x) relative to other predictors. Predictive performances of model-averaged composite and neighborhood-only models were better than a site-only model based on both occurrence (percentage of sites correctly classifiedā€Š=ā€Š0.80Ā±0.03 SD, 0.78Ā±0.02 vs. 0.62Ā±0.05, respectively) and counts (root mean square errorā€Š=ā€Š3.37, 3.93 vs. 5.57, respectively). The importance of both temperature and stream flow for steelhead spawning suggest this species may be highly sensitive to impacts of land and water uses, and to projected climate impacts in the region and that landscape context, complementation, and connectivity will drive how this species responds to future environments.</p></div

    Niche models in native ranges and in the United States.

    No full text
    <p>Ecological niche models for common carp (A, B), tench (C, D), grass carp (E, F), and black carp (G, H) on native and U.S. landscapes. Shading indicates the predicted suitability predicted (brick redā€Š=ā€Š7ā€“10 models, canary redā€Š=ā€Š4ā€“6 models, pinkā€Š=ā€Š1ā€“3 models). Occurrence points for each species are shown as training data (yellow circles) in the species' native range (A, C, E, G) or independent validation data (green triangles) in the native or introduced ranges (B, D, F, H).</p
    corecore